It is very common for bodybuilders to use veterinary steroids for a precontest cycle. Since they are typically assimilated quickly, they do the best work in the shortest amount of time, and are generally out of the system relatively fast in comparison to other ‘roids. And, believe it or not, usually people see fewer side effects when using vet products than when using human ones. Why take anything else? Maybe not ‘why take anything else’, but why not include veterinary steroids, in one form or another, in every cycle? In my mind, veterinary drugs should really be everyone’s choice for extreme condition and definition. They combine well with androgens and other anabolics as well as any drug in the human realm of anabolic steroids. The only problem, these days anyway, is availability. You can find them in Mexico, but you risk fakes, counterfeits, lower quality, or lower dose per ml. You also, of course, face the possibility that you’ll be stopped.
It is often said injectable Winstrol is far more powerful than its oral counterpart, and based on the increased enhancement of nitrogen retention this would support such a belief; however, it's not as cut and dry as you might think. Yes, injecting Stanozolol will increase nitrogen retention beyond what the oral tablet can; however, this increased enhancement is not that significant over the oral form; you can truly obtain the same results with either one. Another myth that often plagues injectable Winstrol surrounds its structural nature, most understand the oral tablet is a C17-aa steroid and assume the injectable form does not carry this hepatotoxic nature; they would be incorrect. Injectable Winstrol is one of the few injectable steroids that is a C17-aa anabolic steroid, and while its hepatotoxic nature is not quite as strong as the oral tablet it is still rather high; in-fact, both forms of Winstrol are some of the most hepatotoxic steroids on the market.